Although some citizens believe that the death penalty should be abolished, it lessens the problem of over population, puts our tax money to a good use, and intimidates people from committing violent crimes to other people.
A human life is extremely precious and it is not something that can be taken away like that. It is implemented for the purpose of providing safety to the community and bringing justice to victims and their families. While there are many supporters of it, there is also a large amount of opposition.
The death penalty. It costs more to have someone go through the death penalty process than to keep him in jail for the rest of his life. If the offender convicted of a felony could show that he had be ordained, he was allowed to go free, subject to the possibility of being punished by the ecclesiastical courts.
Central Idea: Homicide rates are lower in non-death penalty states when compared to states with the death penalty.
Thousands of people in the world history have been acquitted after death. The jury is also a factor in determining penalty.
Nevertheless, this is something that is not as easy to contend, as there are many states, such as California and Arizona, where the death penalty is imposed, yet the number of murders continue to rise.
This is the same concept as eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth. The thing to note is that after a person has been given the death penalty, a long appeals process has to be started.
People continue to murder each other despite knowing that the death penalty is in effect and many people do not think of the consequences when they murder their victims.
Overall, it has been found that it would be much less expensive to keep a convict in jail for the rest of his or her life than to put that person on death row and execute that person.